Audit: your Figma system read the way a maintainer would: token bindings, variant coverage, contrast, detached instances, and whether the naming parses for an agent at all. You get a written report with a fix-first list, plus the fixed quote for the rest.
Foundations: variables with scopes and code syntax, typography and spacing as tokens rather than habits, semantic names through the whole file.
Components: variant sets with bound properties and structured descriptions, built to be read by designers and agents at the same time.
Sync to code: tokens delivered as CSS custom properties or a DESIGN.md your repo's agents load, with written rules that keep generated screens on-system.
Coding agents are probably already building your UI. Left alone with a loose system, an agent invents its own components and hardcodes what it can't find, and a few sprints later the design file and the product no longer describe the same thing. More review meetings don't fix that; a system agents can read does.
What you get
How it works
A short call, then the paid part starts with the audit.
01Foundations and components land in your Figma file with bindings in place.
02The sync to code goes last, written for the agents your team actually runs. You see the system grow in your own file, not in a deck about it.
03
What this isn't
A rebrand, a purchased UI kit with your logo on it, or a promise that agents stop needing review. A good system narrows what can go wrong; your team still owns taste.
FAQ
- We already have a design system. Is this still useful?
- That's the main case. The audit meets the system where it is, and the rebuild extends it rather than replacing it; the goal is one system that people and agents share, not a second one beside the first. Starting from zero works too, it just shifts the weight toward foundations.
- Which tools does this work with?
- Figma with variables on the design side. On the code side, the sync targets whatever your team runs: Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex read the exported rules directly, and tokens as CSS custom properties travel to any stack.
- What does "agent-ready" actually mean?
- Things a machine can parse instead of guess: semantic layer names, variables bound to every color and spacing value, component descriptions with structure, code syntax on tokens. The test is simple: an agent asked to build a new screen produces something on-system without a human explaining the file first.
- Why does only the audit have a price?
- Because system size varies more than journey size. The $500 audit is what fixes the number: after it you get one quote, and the quote doesn't move. What stays constant is the shape of the work: audit, foundations, components, sync.